NIL Is Coming to a Highschool Near You
By Cam Van
More than a year has passed since the US Supreme Court shook the athletic landscape with its earthquaking decision that gave hundreds of thousands of student-athletes the right to monetize their own Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL). While we already broke down what this meant for collegiate athletes, it’s time we take a look at how and whether high school athletes can do the same. Spoilers: it varies by state. Below is a comprehensive breakdown of the current high school NIL landscape with the caveat that things are rapidly changing. We’ll be sure to update this list as appropriate.
The Bottom Line
While some states are slow to adopt, the trend is certainly to allow NIL in some regard. Each state has its own flavor and stipulations, so be sure to check up on your state’s specific handbook for more clarity where needed.
State |
NIL Allowed? |
Governing Law |
Summary |
Alabama |
No |
As of now, high school athletes are prohibited from NIL usage. Moreover, students cannot receive an award of more than $250 for their athletic efforts |
|
Alaska |
Yes |
Alaska gives the green light as long as there is no mention of school, team, or the Alaska School Activities Association |
|
Arizona |
Not Likely |
While it does explicitly say, the handbook has been interpreted broadly to disallow high school NIL by applying the ruling to athlates who “may be eligible in the future” for collegiate athletics |
|
No |
Athletes cannot directly or indirectly “accept gifts, products, awards or monetary compensation for permitting his/her name, picture, or person to be used.” |
||
Yes |
California athletes can monetize their NIL so long as they follow these rules: “(3) Wearing a school team uniform or any identifying school insignia while appearing in any advertisement, promotional activity or endorsement for any commercial product or service; (4) Lending his/her name and team affiliation for purposes of commerical endorsement. Any appearances by students for nonprofit organizations must be approved by the Board of Trustees concerned. This provision is not intended to restrict the right of any student to participate in a commerical endorsement provided there is no school team or school affiliation.” |
||
Colorado |
Yes |
Athletes can’t use school marks, intellectual property, or equipment for their NIL deals. |
|
Connecticut |
Yes |
Athletes must disclose their NIL deals and cannot use their school’s marks. |
|
Delaware |
No |
This is expected to change in the coming months, but for now NIL is prohibited in Delaware. |
|
Florida |
No |
Athletes will lose amateur status if they engage in activities that "capitaliz[e] on athletic fame by receiving money or gifts of a monetary nature." |
|
Georgia |
No |
Athletes lose amateur status if they compete for money or some other form of compensation with exceptions for travel, meals, and lodging. Cannot receive gifts other than college scholarship. |
|
Hawaii |
Unclear but unlikely |
The Hawaii regulation doesn’t explicitly address NIL, but says that Students can lose their amateur status if they compete for moneyany organized athletic activity. |
|
Idaho |
No NIL Law (Student Athletes can generally profit off their NIL) |
Student Athlets can monetize their NIL as long as they do so without school, team, league, district or IHSAA affiliation. |
|
No but likely to change soon |
While the official by-laws prohibit NIL deals, the IHSA recently agreed to allow a junior the ability to sign an NIL deal, meaning that they will likely amend their by-laws in the coming months. |
||
Indiana |
No |
While athletes can appear in advertisements, they cannot receive compensation, as the IHSAA rules prohibit athletes from “capitaliz[ing] on athletic fame by receiving money or gifts of a monetary nature." Doing so forfeits their amateur status. |
|
Iowa |
Yes |
NIL deals are allowed as long as they are not contingent on athletic performance, play, or given by schools. |
|
Kansas |
Yes |
NIL is fair game as long as athletes do not connect themselves with their school in any commercial activity. |
|
No |
Athletes are prohibited from "capitalizing on athletic fame by receiving money or other gifts of monetary value not specifically approved.” An athletes’ use of their likeness in commercial endorsements is specifically prohibited. |
||
Yes |
NIL is widely available for students in LA, and the state has also a partnership with Eccker Sports for educational resources on NIL |
||
Yes |
NIL is widely available, so long as students do not use school logos, or engage in any NIL activities during team activities. There is also al ist of prohibited industries including adult entertainment products and services, alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, controlled dangerous substances, prescription pharmaceuticals, casinos and gambling (including sports betting, lotter, betting in video games, etc.), weapons, firearms and ammunition. |
||
Maryland |
No |
Maryland considers amateurs athletes who “have not used or are not using their athletic skill as players for financial gain, or who have not competed under assumed names as players” |
|
Massachusetts |
Yes |
NIL green light, but no school logo, apparel, or the MIAA logo in any NIL activities.r |
|
Michigan |
No |
While currently prohibited, the MHSAA admin reported there is “a discussion on the table” and they may (similar to Illinois) handle NIL opportunities on a case-by-case basis. |
|
Minnesota |
Yes |
NIL greenlight, excluding gambling, alcohol, tobacco, druge, or weapons. Athletes also can’t use school logos or trademarks for their NIL activities. |
|
Mississippi |
No |
Accepting cash will forfeit amateur status. Same for college athletes. |
|
Missouri |
No |
Students will lose amateurism status if they”capitalizing on athletic fame by receiving money, gifts of monetary value, or merchandise.” Gifts, benefits, awards, and opportunities given to all enrolled students at school will not compromise an athlete’s amateur status and award limits are not applicable |
|
Montana |
No |
No NIL deals. An athlete looses amateur status if they accept NIL money, and no awards more than $100 in value. |
|
Nebraska |
Yes |
Green light for NIL deals, but no compensation for coaching an NSAA approved sport during their sport’s season season |
|
Nevada |
No, but soon |
Nevada Handbook |
While monetizing NIL is currently prohibited, the NIAA board approved NIL related changes in March of 2021 which are expected to go into effect sometime in 2023. |
New Hampshire |
Not likley |
The handbook prohibits athletes from “appearing on radio or television related in any way to his/her athletic ability or prestige; the athlete may not under any circumstance receive remuneration for his/her appearance.” It is unclear whether this extends to NIL activities outside these areas. |
|
New Jersey |
Yes |
NIL greenlight, although no use of NJSIAA or school logos in endorsements. Certain categories are prohibited from endorsing as well such as: adult entertainment products and services, alcohol products, tobacco and nicotine-related products, cannabis products, controlled dangerous substances, prescription pharmaceuticals, casinos and gambling (including sporst betting, the lottery, and betting in connection with video games, online games and mobile devices), and weapons/firearms/ammunition. |
|
New Mexico |
No |
NIL is widely prohibited, and a student will lose their amateur status if they endorse products. |
|
New York |
Yes |
NIL greenlight, but prohibited from singing NIL deals “in affiliation” with their schools, section or the NYSPHSAA. |
|
North Carolina |
No |
No NIL deals are prohibited, and an athlete loses amateur status if they accept money, but not including awards less than $250 in value. |
|
North Dakota |
Yes |
NIL green light, with a prohibition of school uniform or logo use in NIL activities. No booster activities in NIL deals as well. |
|
Ohio |
No |
No NIL activity allowed. The OHSAA voted against an NIL proposal, saying they needed more preparation and education before allowing for NIL activations. |
|
Oklahoma |
Yes |
NIL greenlight. No school logos or uniforms. No pay for athletic achievement. |
|
Oregon |
Yes |
NIL greenlight so long as the deal is not for performance, achievement, enrollment or to rmain enrolled in specific schools, and no use of school marks, names mascots or trademarked OSSAA logos. No school facilities can be used, and no activities that conflict with a members school’s policy may be endorsed. |
|
Pennsylvania |
No but likely soon |
No NIL deals for now but likely soon to come. |
|
Rhode Island |
No |
No NIL deals and students will lose their amateurism status if by “capitalizing on athletic fame by receiving money or gifts of monetary value." |
|
South Carolina |
No |
No NIL monetization and no cash prizes. |
|
South Dakota |
No |
Currently prohibited but SDHSAA is expected to explore NIL possibilities. |
|
Tennessee |
No |
No NIL monetization, but likely to be reviewed in December meeting. |
|
Texas |
No |
No NIL monetization prior to going to college. |
|
Utah |
Yes |
NIL greenlight, but no school uniforms. |
|
Vermont |
No |
Currently no NIL monetization. |
|
Virginia |
No |
While no NIL monetization at this point, the Virginia governor vetoed a bill outright banning high school athlete NIL possibilities, so it may be close on the horizon. |
|
Washington |
No |
No NIL monetization. Athletes cannot advertise or promote a commercial product or service. |
|
Washington D.C. |
Yes |
NIL greenlight. The handbook says that the amateur rules are not “"intended to restrict the right of any student to participate in a commercial or marketing endorsements," so long as there is no school logo or apparel usage. |
|
West Virginia |
No |
No NIL monetization. Handbook asserts that athletes will lose their amateur status by “capitalizing on athletic fame by receiving money or gifts of monetary value (scholarships to institutions of higher learning are specifically exempted)." |
|
Wisconsin |
No |
No NIL monetization. Amateruism can be forfeit is an athlete ““receiv[es] compensation or benefit, directly or indirectly, for the use of name, picture and/or personal appearance." |
|
Wyoming |
No |
Similar to Wisconsin, an athlete will lose amateur status if they “capitaliz[e] on athletic fame by receiving money, gifts of monetary value or merchandise.” |